Trump v. Slaughter · Humphrey's overruled · 6–3 · Jun 29 ⚖ Trump v. Cook · Fed independence · 5–4 · Jun 29 ⚖ Trump v. Barbara · birthright upheld · 6–3 · Jun 30 ⚖ NRSC v. FEC · coordinated spending · 6–3 · Jun 30 ⚖ West Virginia v. B.P.J. · trans sports bans · Jun 30 ⚖ H.R.6644 · on President's desk · unsigned ⚖ FISA §702 · lapsed · day 24 ⚖ SCOTUS · administrative term · Jul 1 ⚖ Trump v. Slaughter · Humphrey's overruled · 6–3 · Jun 29 ⚖ Trump v. Cook · Fed independence · 5–4 · Jun 29 ⚖ Trump v. Barbara · birthright upheld · 6–3 · Jun 30 ⚖ NRSC v. FEC · coordinated spending · 6–3 · Jun 30 ⚖ West Virginia v. B.P.J. · trans sports bans · Jun 30 ⚖ H.R.6644 · on President's desk · unsigned ⚖ FISA §702 · lapsed · day 24 ⚖ SCOTUS · administrative term · Jul 1 ⚖

June 29–July 5, 2026 · October Term 2025 · final gavel

6–3

Over
Ruled

Trump v. Slaughter · No. 25-332

On the term's penultimate Monday, Chief Justice John Roberts held 6-3 that Congress cannot shield Federal Trade Commission commissioners from at-will presidential removal — explicitly overruling Humphrey's Executor v. United States after 91 years and granting the president sweeping new authority over roughly two dozen independent agencies exercising executive power.

Sources: SCOTUSblog — Trump v. Slaughter · LII — No. 25-332

Monday, June 29 · Removal power

6–3

Trump v. Slaughter

Roberts wrote that FTC commissioners exercise "the very essence" of executive power — rulemaking, in-house adjudication, and civil enforcement — and therefore must be removable at the president's pleasure. The decision permits President Trump's firing of Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter and threatens for-cause protections at the NLRB, CPSC, NRC, FERC, and Merit Systems Protection Board.

Source: SCOTUSblog — Slaughter

Monday, June 29 · The exception

5–4

Trump v. Cook

The same morning, Roberts held 5-4 that Governor Lisa Cook may remain on the Federal Reserve Board while her challenge proceeds — the Fed's 111-year tradition of central-bank independence carved out an exception to the Slaughter framework. The Court left open whether Trump may yet fire Cook with proper pre-termination process.

Source: SCOTUSblog — Cook

The end of Humphrey's Executor

Majority
Dissent

Roberts, C.J. · Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett, JJ. · Sotomayor, J., dissenting (Kagan & Jackson, JJ.)

Justice Sonia Sotomayor's dissent warned the decision "dismantles the independent-agency structure Congress has built over nearly a century." Justice Neil Gorsuch concurred separately to argue courts should more aggressively police Congress's delegation of legislative and judicial powers to agencies — a nondelegation argument the majority did not reach.

The ruling is the culmination of a years-long erosion of New Deal-era removal protections, following Seila Law v. CFPB (2020) and Collins v. Yellen (2021).

Sources: Bloomberg Law — regulatory impact · Sidley — Humphrey's analysis

"If anything more is left of Humphrey's, we overrule it."

Chief Justice John Roberts · Trump v. Slaughter · slip op.

Source: SCOTUSblog — Slaughter opinion

111

Years of Fed independence

Cook and the procedural line

Cook was the first Federal Reserve governor ever fired. Roberts held the president failed to afford her the statutory and due-process protections required before termination — she received notice only via a Truth Social post, with no opportunity to contest the mortgage-fraud allegations before removal.

The narrow ruling distinguished the Fed's unique historical role from multi-member commissions like the FTC. Roberts noted in a footnote that nothing forbids Trump from "trying again" to remove Cook with proper process — leaving the ultimate "for cause" question unresolved.

Sources: AP News — Cook ruling · CNBC — Fed independence

Tuesday, June 30 · Final opinion day

Three blockbusters to close the term

Jun 30 · Kavanaugh, J.

West Virginia v. B.P.J.

6–3 EPC · 9–0 Title IX

States may restrict women's and girls' school sports teams to biological females. All nine justices agreed Title IX permits sex-separated teams; six held the Equal Protection Clause does not forbid the policy.

Jun 30 · Kavanaugh, J.

NRSC v. FEC

6–3 · FECA · No. 24-621

Federal limits on coordinated party expenditures violate the First Amendment — overruling Colorado II (2001). Political parties may now spend unlimited sums in coordination with preferred candidates.

Jun 30 · Roberts, C.J.

Trump v. Barbara

6–3 · 14th Am. · No. 25-365

Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are citizens at birth. The Court struck down Executive Order 14160 and reaffirmed Wong Kim Ark (1898).

Source: National Law Journal — final opinion day

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

Trump v. Barbara — birthright preserved

Roberts held the Citizenship Clause unambiguously covers children born on U.S. soil regardless of parental immigration status — rejecting the administration's argument that "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" requires permanent parental domicile. Five justices joined the majority on constitutional grounds; Justice Brett Kavanaugh concurred in the judgment on statutory grounds alone.

Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissented, arguing for a narrower reading of the Clause. Speaker Mike Johnson raised the possibility of a constitutional amendment — requiring two-thirds of both chambers and ratification by three-fourths of states.

6 Majority
3 Dissent

Sources: SCOTUSblog — Barbara · LII — No. 25-365

∞

Coordinated party expenditure cap · eliminated

NRSC v. FEC unlocks party spending

Kavanaugh wrote for six justices that 52 U.S.C. § 30116(d) limits on coordinated expenditures by national and state party committees are an unconstitutional restriction on political speech. The decision overrules FEC v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee (2001) and removes a key anti-circumvention tool Congress used to prevent donors from evading individual contribution caps.

Justice Elena Kagan dissented for the liberal bloc, arguing coordinated spending caps "pass that test with flying colors" as narrowly tailored anti-corruption measures. The case originated from then-Senate candidate J.D. Vance's challenge to FECA limits.

Sources: National Law Journal — NRSC v. FEC · SCOTUSblog — No. 24-621

West Virginia v. B.P.J.

Consolidated with Little v. Hecox · Nos. 24-43, 24-56

9–0

Title IX

All nine justices agreed that Title IX permits schools to designate sports teams by biological sex. West Virginia's Save Women's Sports Act and Idaho's similar law do not violate the federal civil rights statute.

6–3

Equal Protection

Kavanaugh's majority applied intermediate scrutiny and held sex-based athletic eligibility rules are substantially related to safety and competitive-fairness interests — even for transgender athletes who have taken puberty-blocking medication.

Sources: SCOTUSblog — B.P.J. · AP News — trans sports ruling

Dissent spotlight · Trump v. Slaughter

"Today's decision returns us to a world in which independent judgment at the nation's regulatory agencies exists only at the pleasure of the President."

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, dissenting · joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson

Source: SCOTUSblog — Sotomayor dissent

Concurrence spotlight

Gorsuch on nondelegation

In Trump v. Slaughter, Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote separately to argue the president has accumulated "vast legislative and judicial powers" through congressional delegation — and that courts should more robustly police those delegations. The concurrence signals future challenges to the administrative state's structural foundations, even as the majority rested on removal power alone.

Source: Bloomberg Law — Gorsuch concurrence

Follow-up · since last edition

H.R. 6644 sits unsigned on the Resolute Desk

Since Congress sent the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act to the President last week, Trump canceled a planned signing ceremony on June 24 — demanding passage of the SAVE America Act's voter-ID provisions first. The enrolled bill was formally presented June 29; it may still become law without his signature if Congress remains in session and the 10-day window (excluding Sundays) expires without a veto.

Jun 22

Senate passes final text 85–5.

Jun 23

House concurs 358–32 under suspension of the rules.

Jun 29

Enrolled bill presented to the President.

~Jul 10

Pocket-signature deadline if Congress stays in session and no veto is returned.

Sources: Congress.gov — H.R. 6644 actions · TIME — signing delay

Judge Garaufis demands DOJ explain Adani dismissal

E.D.N.Y. · FCPA & securities fraud · Rule 48(a)

May 18

DOJ moves to dismiss with prejudice

The Trump administration seeks to drop the Biden-era indictment against Gautam Adani and seven co-defendants over alleged $250 million in bribes to Indian officials and misleading U.S. investors.

Jun 26

Garaufis orders detailed explanation

Judge Nicholas Garaufis declined to immediately approve dismissal, calling the government's initial motion "terse, bland, and conclusory" and directing prosecutors to supply factual support for each basis by July 13.

Jul 4

DOJ files 10-page defense

Principal Associate Deputy AG R. Trent McCotter argued the case "should never have been brought" — citing jurisdictional flaws, absent investor losses, and FCPA enforcement priorities under the May 2025 memorandum limiting foreign-bribery prosecutions lacking U.S. nexus.

Sources: The Wire — Garaufis order · Outlook Business — DOJ filing

0

Days since §702 lapsed · June 12, 2026

Section 702 enters fourth week without reauthorization

Congress has not reauthorized the foreign-surveillance authority since its statutory expiration — the first lapse in the program's 18-year history. Bipartisan negotiations remain stalled over President Trump's appointment of Bill Pulte as acting Director of National Intelligence. Existing FISC certifications approved in March may permit continued collection through early 2027, but the government cannot issue new targeting directives during the lapse.

Sources: Nextgov — 702 lapse · EFF — expiration analysis

July 1, 2026 · Administrative term begins

The marble halls go quiet

After issuing its final three opinions on June 30, the Supreme Court rose for summer recess. The 2026–27 adjudicative term will resume after September 1. The justices remain available for emergency applications, disciplinary matters, and the shadow docket — but the opinion days that defined this week are over until October.

Source: National Law Journal — summer recess

State highlight

California's trans-inclusive sports law faces new federal headwinds

The B.P.J. ruling leaves unresolved challenges to state laws in California and Connecticut that permit transgender girls to compete on girls' teams — creating immediate tension between the Supreme Court's green light for exclusionary statutes and progressive state policies. California Attorney General Rob Bonta indicated his office is reviewing whether existing state anti-discrimination protections can coexist with the federal ruling's Title IX framework.

Source: Husch Blackwell — state law implications

The Week Ahead

FAR comment deadline

Paperwork Reduction Act comment period closes on EO 14398 federal-contractor reporting requirements — 91 Fed. Reg. 24544.

H.R. 6644 pocket-signature watch

Tenth calendar day (excluding Sundays) since presentment — housing bill may become law without presidential signature if Congress remains in session.

FISA reauthorization negotiations

House Intelligence Committee staff continue assessing surveillance authority workarounds as Jay Clayton's DNI nomination proceeds through the Senate.

Anti-weaponization pretrial conference

Follow-up conference in Fund for an Open Government v. Trump after Judge Leonie Brinkema ordered discovery into the anti-weaponization fund's operations.

Adani dismissal briefing

DOJ's detailed factual filing on the motion to dismiss the Gautam Adani FCPA indictment is due in E.D.N.Y. under Judge Garaufis's June 26 order.

Jackler opening brief

Federal Circuit en banc briefing opens in the fired-immigration-judge CSRA removal dispute granted en banc June 17.

DOJ answer due

Justice Department responsive pleading deadline in the Virginia anti-weaponization fund challenge.

What is Legally Brief?