Williams sanctions Trump IRS suit · Jul 13⚖Kagan & Barrett testify on Hill · Jul 14⚖Alien Terrorist Removal Court · first filing · Jul 15⚖3d Cir. strikes NJ AR-15 ban · 10–5 · Jul 17⚖Edwards pays record $12M HSR fine · Jul 13⚖Apple wins 14-agency discovery · Jul 15⚖Blanche AG confirmation hearing · Jul 15–16⚖FISA §702 · day 38 · still lapsed⚖Williams sanctions Trump IRS suit · Jul 13⚖Kagan & Barrett testify on Hill · Jul 14⚖Alien Terrorist Removal Court · first filing · Jul 15⚖3d Cir. strikes NJ AR-15 ban · 10–5 · Jul 17⚖Edwards pays record $12M HSR fine · Jul 13⚖Apple wins 14-agency discovery · Jul 15⚖Blanche AG confirmation hearing · Jul 15–16⚖FISA §702 · day 38 · still lapsed⚖
July 13–19, 2026 · Sunday Edition · institutional fracture
Manipulate
$0B
On July 13, U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams sanctioned attorneys and voided the purported settlement of President Trump's lawsuit against the IRS — finding the $10 billion complaint was filed in bad faith to lend judicial legitimacy to a $1.776 billion "anti-weaponization" fund and sweeping tax audit immunity.
"This lawsuit was not brought to vindicate rights; it was brought to manipulate the judicial process to pursue benefits unavailable in litigation because the parties were not adverse."
via S.D. Fla. · No. 26-cv-20176 · July 13, 2026
Rare congressional appearance · July 14, 2026
Justices on the Hill
K
Justice Elena Kagan
Liberal wing · first Senate testimony since 2011
Kagan confirmed the Court intensified security after Chief Justice Roberts was warned in 2017 that the Court's posture was "crazy," and supported creating an enforcement mechanism for the Court's 2023 ethics code — acknowledging enforcement would be "tricky" since the Court sits at the head of the judicial branch.
370+
threats against federal judges in FY 2025, per judiciary data cited at hearing
B
Justice Amy Coney Barrett
Conservative wing · first House testimony since 2019
Barrett recounted a recent swatting incident at her home in an unusually personal plea for funding. She described false emergency calls to police as part of a surge in threats, harassment, and intimidation directed at federal jurists and their families.
54
new Supreme Court Police officers requested — six additional agents per justice
$0.0M
Fiscal 2027 budget request — roughly 10% increase, including $14.6M for expanded Supreme Court Police and $6.5M for exterior visitor screening facility design
Congress establishes the Alien Terrorist Removal Court under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act. Chief Justice appoints five district judges to review removal applications for noncitizens designated "alien terrorists."
1996–2025
Zero applications filed. The Federal Judicial Center notes the court "had never received an application" and therefore never conducted proceedings.
Jul 15
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche submits the first-ever removal application — sealed, with classified cover sheet — seeking to deport an individual identified as an alien terrorist.
Jul 16
Chief Judge Joan N. Ericksen (D. Minn.) holds a closed hearing, hears attorney arguments without sworn testimony, and orders DOJ to file supplemental factual and legal analysis by July 22 — writing the government "could benefit from the opportunity for more thoughtful consideration."
Ass'n of N.J. Rifle & Pistol Clubs v. Att'y Gen. New Jersey · 3d Cir. · No. 24-02415 · en banc
First appeals court strikes an assault-weapons ban
On July 17, a 10-5 en banc Third Circuit held New Jersey's ban on semi-automatic rifles and magazines holding more than 10 rounds unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. Writing for the majority, Judge Arianna Freeman found AR-15s and large-capacity magazines are "plainly in common use" for lawful purposes — the first federal appellate court to invalidate such a state ban.
Creates a direct circuit split with the Seventh Circuit, which upheld Illinois' AR-15 ban on July 9 — just weeks after SCOTUS granted certiorari in challenges to assault-weapons bans in Illinois and Connecticut.
10-5 en banc majority holds semi-automatic rifles and LCMs are in "common use" — states cannot ban firearms merely because they perceive them as "unusually dangerous."
Seventh Circuit · Jul 9, 2026
Ban upheld
Panel majority upholds Illinois' assault-weapons and LCM restrictions, noting "every circuit to have confronted the issue" had reached the same conclusion — before the Third Circuit broke ranks.
On July 13, the FTC and DOJ filed a complaint and proposed final judgment in D.D.C. against Edwards Lifesciences and Genesis MedTech, alleging the parties intentionally structured Edwards' 2024 acquisition of JC Medical to stay below the $119.5M Hart-Scott-Rodino reporting threshold — while a separate $25M equity investment pushed total consideration above the line.
The agencies alleged the parties were in violation for 721 days. Edwards must also provide 30 days' advance notice for future aortic-regurgitation device acquisitions and implement a formal antitrust compliance program.
Special Discovery Master Jose Linares overruled the DOJ's motion to quash Apple's Rule 45 subpoenas, finding all document requests relevant to the government's iPhone monopolization claims and rejecting broad national-security objections as unsubstantiated. Agencies may still withhold specific privileged records via privilege logs.
"What happened to the Todd Blanche who was a prosecutor in the Southern District of New York?"
Acting AG Todd Blanche
"We are not moving forward with the fund, period." — on the $1.776 billion anti-weaponization fund, though he declined to commit to rescinding the May 18 memo in writing.
Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.)
Pressed Blanche on Epstein file handling, the Paramount-Warner Bros. merger review, and whether his prior role as Trump's personal criminal defense attorney creates structural conflicts at the helm of the Justice Department.
Blanche testified July 15 before the Senate Judiciary Committee and faced outside witnesses July 16. With all Democrats expected to oppose and Sen. Cornyn undecided, the nominee needs unanimous Republican support to advance from committee.
Follow-up: Under Judge Nicholas Garaufis's July 8 order, Gautam Adani filed a sworn statement denying any promise, offer, or agreement connected to the Justice Department's motion to dismiss the Biden-era FCPA indictment. Adani stated the Adani Group's interest in a $10 billion U.S. investment "had no role" in DOJ's decision, and he was "not aware of any agreement exchanging anything for the dismissal."
Principal Associate Deputy AG R. Trent McCotter maintained he would have sought dismissal "regardless of any mentions of investments." Garaufis has not yet ruled on the Rule 48(a) motion.
Jackler v. Department of Justice · Fed. Cir. · No. 2026-1575 · en banc
Opening brief filed in civil-service removal showdown
Whether the Civil Service Reform Act's procedural and substantive protections for federal workers conflict with the President's Article II removal power.
Follow-up: Fired immigration judges Megan Jackler and Brandon Jaroch filed their en banc opening brief on July 14, as scheduled. The MSPB had held in March that as inferior officers exercising significant adjudicative authority, the judges could be removed at will — abrogating 5 U.S.C. § 7513 protections. The government's response brief is due within 45 days.
DOJ answer due in anti-weaponization fund challenge
Follow-up: Under Judge Leonie Brinkema's June 24 order in Fund for an Open Government v. Trump (E.D. Va.), the Justice Department's responsive pleading was due Friday — after Brinkema declined to dismiss the challenge despite Blanche's verbal assurances the $1.776 billion fund would not proceed. Williams's July 13 sanctions order in the parallel IRS case now separately bars parties from citing the purported settlement in any official proceeding.
Section 702 enters sixth week without reauthorization
Follow-up: The foreign-surveillance authority that lapsed June 12 has now been expired for 38 days. Bipartisan negotiations remain stalled over Bill Pulte's interim appointment as acting director of national intelligence. Existing FISC certifications approved in March may permit continued collection through March 17, 2027, but the government cannot issue new targeting directives during the lapse.
NJ officials weigh options after Third Circuit ruling
New Jersey Attorney General officials are reviewing the Third Circuit's 10-5 decision striking the state's assault-firearms and large-capacity magazine bans — the first federal appellate invalidation of such restrictions. The case was remanded to the District of New Jersey to determine whether other banned firearm categories also fall under the majority's "common use" holding, while the state evaluates emergency appellate options.